Tower hits homeowner with $10,000 premium hike under new quake risk assessment
Monday, 13 August 2018
A $10,000 insurance premium hike from financially troubled Tower was a bit rich for Christchurch homeowner Roy Howell who had to find another more affordable insurer.
Tower confirmed the price rise from $2300 a year to $12,843 and said there was more to come for other Kiwis – the company will roll out fully risk-based assessments for flooding, erosion, storm and other identifiable risks.
Howell lives in a 1920s bungalow in the well-heeled suburb of Strowan-Merivale close to St Andrews College. He said his insurance broker was gobsmacked at the increase.
'They never gave me any warning, just a letter. I have a mortgage so the bank needs insurance certification. Increases like this could break a sale.'
**READ MORE:
* House insurance increases highest in four years
* A $5000 increase: Here's why your insurance might be going up
* Tower insurance premiums put the squeeze on homeowners
* Blue chip earthquake blues**
Howell said his broker had found alternative cover from another company that was modest compared with Tower's $12,000.
'I've supported Tower over 30 years so I was pretty annoyed when they dropped this on me. My earthquake repairs were relatively small, about $40,000,' Howell said.
Tower's team leader retention, Hayden Lewis, sent Howell a letter apologising for the lack of communication.
'To hear your premiums will be increasing by over $870-a-month this year would be disturbing for anyone so I can completely understand your response.
'We really have valued being your preferred choice for insurance for many years, and understand that Tower's decision to change our approach to pricing house insurance has had a significant impact on you,' Lewis said.
'The reality is that the insurance costs to cover earthquakes (called reinsurance) can differ a lot between regions.
'Our new approach removes much of these cross-subsidisation in house insurance premiums, meaning what customers pay will more accurately reflect the cost of providing cover for their individual property.
'We are confident that this change is the right thing for Tower, but that does not mean it was an easy decision for us to make.
'You have a large home with a high sum insured value, and you are located in an area that has extremely high risk of severe damage in a major earthquake.
'As discussed I can recommend Apex (no commission relationship) who can assist you. We have chosen to work with their firm as their mission is all about customer first, and finding the right solution for your needs, and this aligns with our values,' the letter said.
NZbrokers service manager Simon Moss said Tower appeared to be disengaging from some regions. It was possible to assess risk on a house by house basis with all the data available nowadays, he said.
Insurance Council chief executive Tim Grafton said Tower was the only New Zealand company to go to a fully risk-based approach.
Two of IAG's brands, State and AMI had moved to partial risk-based cover but nowhere near the extent of Tower.
The premiums of homeowners in places like Auckland, the largest market, would be reduced under Tower's formula, and still operating under a pooling formula might find themselves at a disadvantage.
'The most expensive year for insurers for storm damage was 2017 at $243 million. But this still pales into comparison with the Canterbury earthquakes at $21 billion, including commercial property, as well as EQC's $12b.
Tower chief executive Richard Harding recently issued a statement about the rises, saying they would mostly apply to high-spec homes in high risk locations like Wellington, Napier and Gisborne.
About 3 per cent of the company's customers would be affected by rises.
Tower had significant exposure to the earthquakes and recently posted an $11 million loss for the half year ending March 2018.