Ruapehu skifield company seeks corporate investors to stay afloat
Thursday, 12 August 2021
The not-for-profit company that runs the Ruapehu skifields wants to radically change its ownership structure, bringing corporate investors on board for the first time to keep the struggling operation viable.
Ruapehu Alpine Lifts, which operates the Whakapapa and Turoa skifields, the largest ski areas in New Zealand, wants to sell half its shares to raise $30 million.
That would require a change to the constitution, under which RAL pays no dividends, no tax, and reinvests any profits back into the mountain, which is part of the World Heritage-listed Tongariro National Park.
The move is likely to spark a fierce debate among mum and dad shareholders, some of whom fear it will mean corporate interests, possibly from overseas, will get hold of the business and change it forever.
“The whole idea … is that the mountain is for the people, it is not for making profit as such,” says shareholder Rob Eller.
But RAL is in financial trouble following “unprecedented” events such as warm winters and border shutdowns due to the Covid-19 pandemic.
**READ MORE:
* Skifield company RAL is trying to exert its rights on Mt Ruapehu, causing tension
* Ruapehu: disorganisation and money wars
**
It posted a $22m loss last year, which included a $20m write-down of the value of assets at Turoa and an operating loss of $4m, offset by $2m from the Covid-19 wage subsidy scheme.
According to its annual report, RAL’s bank was only supporting it on a month-by-month basis during the early stages of the Covid crisis but has since agreed to provide a seasonal facility and term borrowings until the end of November on the condition that the company complete a capital restructure.
The company's auditor, Deloitte, would not express an opinion on the company’s financial statements, saying its validity as a going concern was based on “a number of assumptions” such as debt not being called in before the November expiry date and finance continuing beyond then.
In an update to shareholders in February, former chairman Murray Gribben said a process to review sources of capital began last September.
“We are seeking to raise up to $30 million of new equity capital, which corresponds to a 50 per cent shareholding … and we are looking for a strategic partner who can help the business develop to the next level,” Gribben wrote.
Nine parties had so far expressed interest.
“This investment will give the strategic partner the opportunity to own a … stake in an iconic business with significant exposure to domestic tourism,” Gribben wrote.
“We believe that the strategic partner will have a key governance role in helping to shape the future development of on-mountain facilities and off-mountain opportunities.”
But Gribben said the interested parties did not want to invest in a company that could not return dividends or coupons, and “there is an expectation that the corporate structure will be changed to accommodate for this”.
Geoff Taylor, who took over as RAL’s chairman at the annual meeting in May, told shareholders they would be asked to allow for a change in corporate structure that meant new investors could access profits.
Taylor declined to comment when approached by Stuff.
“There is nothing to add beyond what has already been communicated,” he said.
Eller said shareholders were being kept in the dark about how the proposed restructure would be achieved. His questions were going unanswered, he said.
He was concerned the board, and trustees of a trust which held a majority of shares in the company, were trying to take power away from individual shareholders.
The trust, formed in 1983 with the stated aim of “preserving RAL in its current form”, was given a 45 per cent shareholding with the intention of preventing any individual or group from taking over the company.
But through forfeitures, the trust now holds 55 per cent of shares.
“That gives them total control of the company and they can do what they like,” Eller said.
Eller said one solution was for the community to band together to buy Turoa or RAL as a whole. “This is a big ask but Ohakune, Raetihi, National Park and iwi groups … are all part of the solution.
“We don’t want it sold to a big greedy corporate.”
Another shareholder, Sam Clarkson, said the board was not being transparent with shareholders. Ever since the company had taken over Turoa in 2000, becoming a monopoly, it had become more and more like a corporate and the capital restructure was just an extension of that.
“They have behaved exactly as you would expect a monopoly to behave – they have become bloated, lazy, greedy, arrogant.”
Clarkson said the answer to RAL’s financial troubles was to sell Turoa, cut the “bloated and overpaid” levels of marketing and management “and get back to what the company was created to do – which is run ski lifts.”