Top storiesNew ZealandPoliticsBusinessEntertainmentSportsWorld

Urban expansion gobbling up some of New Zealand's most versatile land

Thursday, 19 April 2018

Access national environmental reporting on New Zealand’s land. New Zealand's Environmental Reporting Series is co-produced by Stats NZ and the Ministry for the Environment.

Unchecked expansion of towns and cities is gobbling up some of the country's best farm land, according to a new report.

The findings have prompted Environment Minister David Parker to investigate the unchecked growth of cities such as Auckland, and even the future of the traditional Kiwi lifestyle block, in order to protect productive land.

Our Land 2018 profiles the changing face of Aotearoa, and reports towns and cities have grown 10 per cent between 1996 and 2012, with about two-fifths of new urban developments built on arable land.

The Our Land 2018 report profiles the changing landscape of Aotearoa – a landscape that lost 31,000 hectares of tussock, 24,000  ha of indigenous scrubland, and 16,000 ha of forest between 1996 and 2012.
The Our Land 2018 report profiles the changing landscape of Aotearoa – a landscape that lost 31,000 hectares of tussock, 24,000 ha of indigenous scrubland, and 16,000 ha of forest between 1996 and 2012.

Parker held up the loss of prime gardening land around Pukekohe to Auckland's expansion as a prime example.

**READ MORE:

* Native birds in 'desperate situation'

* National Parks plan review amid growing tourism

* Concern over lack of plans for threatened species**

The Hamilton suburb of Rototuna is rapidly expanding across the Waikato plains.
The Hamilton suburb of Rototuna is rapidly expanding across the Waikato plains.

'I have asked officials to start work on a National Policy Statement for Versatile Land and High Class Soils,' he said.

'We have to ensure we have enough land to build the houses people need, but we must protect our most productive areas too.'

New Zealand lost 31,000 hectares of tussock between 1996 and 2012.
New Zealand lost 31,000 hectares of tussock between 1996 and 2012.

The report also found the state of biodiversity, native ecosystems, and soil continued to decline.

The country lost 31,000 hectares of tussock, 24,000ha of indigenous scrubland, and 16,000ha of forest between 1996 and 2012.

Native bush still covers half the country, but most of this area is in hilly or mountainous terrain, which cannot accommodate a lot of the native flora and fauna.
Native bush still covers half the country, but most of this area is in hilly or mountainous terrain, which cannot accommodate a lot of the native flora and fauna.

It was humble soil that created the most concern however, with ballooning intensive agriculture contributing to the estimated loss of 192 million tonnes of soil to erosion every year.

A little under half of this loss came from pasture.

The amount of plantation forest has decreased in recent times, a blow for New Zealand
The amount of plantation forest has decreased in recent times, a blow for New Zealand's carbon neutral 2050 target.

The erosion created a double-whammy for climate change, with the sediment in river channels compounding flooding risks already posed by climate change.

Erosion reduced soil quality, impacting the health of pasture and crops, and also making New Zealand's largest carbon sink less efficient at sucking up greenhouse gases.

The erosion was also predicted to affect the foundations of fencing, roads, and housing.

Ministry for the Environment deputy secretary Penny Nelson said the report made it clear Kiwis needed to pay attention to what's going on in their soil, which underpinned their economy.

Land-based production from the likes of forestry, agriculture, and horticulture earned $35.4 billion in 2016 – half the country's total export earnings. Tourism added an additional $14.7b.

'This report also reinforces that our land-use decisions are putting our environment under pressure. What we do on our land has effects across our environment and economy. It affects our water quality, the marine environment and the volume of greenhouse gas emissions,' Nelson said.

Overall roughly half of New Zealand's land is now modified grasslands, cropland and urban areas.

While this leaves half as indigenous, these areas were mainly spread over hilly or mountainous terrain, and did not support large swathes of native flora and fauna.

Also causing concern were heightened phosphorus content in soil and higher rates of compaction of soil.

Nearly half of the 11 regions tested across the country were outside the target range for both these soil health indicators.

Heightened phosphorus levels could affect water health as the soil ran off, impacting native fish, and more compacted soil made it harder for plants and crops to thrive.

The area of land used for agriculture fell 7 per cent between 2002 and 2012.

In the same period land used for dairy grew by nearly half, and sheep and beef land use fell by a fifth.

The intensification of farming also steadily increased, with rising numbers of animals by area.

All of it came at the expense of biodiversity and native ecosystems.

Of the 344 land animals classified as threatened, 83 per cent were still classed as threatened or at risk of extinction, and the status of 11 species declined.

Progress was made for 20 birds, with 10 reliant on intensive conservation management.

Forest & Bird chief executive Kevin Hague said the report reflected what happened when the economy was directed towards low value commodities like milk powder, raw logs, and bulk tourism.

'Our land, soils, water, and native species are taking the hit.'

In recent times plantation forests have seen marked decreases. From 2006 to 2015 there was about twice as much deforestation as afforestation, and this is similar for the period 2013 to 2015.

With forestry being the largest carbon sink in the country, this trend had a negative impact climate change mitigation.

DATA GAPS

The report also highlighted 'significant gaps' in coverage, consistency, and scale that limited the analysis that could be undertaken.

Government statistician Liz MacPherson said important parts of the land story were missing. 'There are significant gaps in our knowledge and the available data, especially integrated data at a national scale.

'Without more up-to-date information on land cover, land use, erosion, soil and ecosystem health, we cannot fully understand the extent of pressures, the rate of change, or what impacts changes in soil and biodiversity are having on our social, cultural, economic and environmental wellbeing.

'That's an issue we and the Ministry for the Environment, along with others, will actively address.'

Currently, Statistics New Zealand did not have a single place for land information and emerging land use practices, and land use intensity, she said. 

It meant they could not report on how intensively that land was used. 

'We can't manage what we can't see.'