Top storiesNew ZealandPoliticsBusinessEntertainmentSportsWorld

'Extreme risk': Police borrowed firefighter helmets at riotous end of occupation

Thursday, 20 April 2023

Police response to the IPCA report on the policing of the occupation of Parliament in 2022

Police officers borrowed helmets from firefighters in the thick of an operation to end a 23-day occupation of Parliament, which the police watchdog has now labelled “incomplete and inadequate”.

The Independent Police Conduct Authority (IPCA) has released its report scrutinising the police response to the occupation around Parliament from February 8 to March 2, after receiving more than 1900 complaints. It showed police were ill-equipped, including not having enough hard armour for all, especially during the riot that ended the occupation on March 2.

The IPCA report analysing Police’s actions during the 23-day protest said Police had acted with restraint and the use of force had been justified.
The IPCA report analysing Police’s actions during the 23-day protest said Police had acted with restraint and the use of force had been justified.

Police Association Vice-President Paul Ormerod​ said officers there that day reported an “unprecedented” level of violence. A lack of tactical equipment put them at “extreme risk”, he said.

There were 150 officers injured during the 23-day operation but that number would have been much lower if they had the proper equipment. Some were still suffering long term injuries, he said.

**READ MORE:

Police clash with protesters as they remove tents and camping equipment from Parliament’s grounds on day 23 of occupation.
Police clash with protesters as they remove tents and camping equipment from Parliament’s grounds on day 23 of occupation.

* Year-long $3.5m review into police conduct at Parliament occupation imminent

* Jacinda Ardern interviewed for investigation into police conduct during Parliament protest

* $3.5 million Parliament occupation investigation won't get all the answers, National says

**

A video recap of the 23-day occupation of Parliament's grounds in February and March 2022.

Police staff ended up borrowing helmets from firefighters on the day while on-the-ground commanders sent out to local tactical shops for helmets, he said.

IPCA chairperson Judge Colin Doherty said that while overall police conduct was remarkably restrained, the plan to clear the protesters on March 2 was “incomplete and inadequate”.

The report revealed almost all the officers spoken to said they seriously feared for their safety during the riot. One officer said they were terrified when the fires started and another said they were certain they were going to die when the occupiers started throwing bricks.

“It kind of felt like I was at war, to be honest,” an unnamed officer said. “I thought to myself, ‘We’re dead’.”

The report revealed almost all the officers spoken to said they seriously feared for their safety during the riot.
The report revealed almost all the officers spoken to said they seriously feared for their safety during the riot.
The Post's editor Caitlin Cherry and Kate Hannah from The Disinformation Project discuss how disinformation is still present in our community, one year on from the occupation at Parliament.

Doherty found the plan had not properly addressed clearing the grounds, how police would hold the ground they had already reclaimed, how the protesters' property would be managed, and how evidence would be collected.

Most officers felt they had not been adequately equipped with protective gear.

Police were initially informed they could not wear hard body armour, such as shields and long batons for the operation due to concerns that fully armoured police would aggravate the protesters and negatively affect the public’s perception of police.

However, as the operation became more violent, many police were concerned. One officer said the equipment part of the operation had been “absolutely shambolic” and another said it was lucky an officer didn’t get killed.

Officers burst into laughter when they were told before the operation they wouldn’t be given helmets, pepper spray, or tasers, despite being told safety being a priority, the report says.

“Staff were not adequately equipped to respond to the threat posed by protesters. This was foreseeable and avoidable.”

Eighty-two police officers were treated for injuries, with six taken to an emergency department for serious injuries, including fractured bones, head and chest injuries, and a suspected spinal injury.

The IPCA received more 250 complaints about police’s use of force when dealing with protesters – the majority from people who had seen the incidents on television or social media.

However, the IPCA found the use of force on March 2 justified for the most part, including use of weapons such as fire hoses had been justified, despite the Professional Firefighters’ Union previously calling their use on the protesters “unacceptable”.

The use of sponge rounds was what many police believed helped them regain control of the situation and remove the last of the protesters, the report said.

“The decision was made by someone to deploy sponge rounds and I thought, ‘That’s probably the single best decision made of the day’,” an officer said.

Seven complaints from people alleging police used unjustified or unreasonable force on them personally are being investigated independently.

The IPCA also found that, despite intelligence provided, police had failed to properly consider the size of the convoy as it approached Wellington.

Wellington City Council should have been consulted well before their arrival about whether traffic management plan needed to be put in place, which could have prevented vehicles reaching the city centre.

“The estimation of the number of vehicles reported to be headed for the Wellington City Centre was fairly reliable and readily verifiable information, and certainly warranted consideration for what response was required to manage it.”

The failure of an earlier operation on February 10 to remove protesters from the grounds had been unlikely to succeed as there was no “properly articulated and communicated” plan, meaning police were unprepared for the resistance they encountered.

While many Wellington police officers were of the view the February operation had been the result of “strong political pressure,” with some implying this had intruded on police independence, the IPCA found the commissioner’s decision for police to undergo the operation was his own.

Other findings