Top storiesNew ZealandPoliticsBusinessEntertainmentSportsWorld

Apple cleared of infringing wireless tech patents

Tuesday, 17 March 2015

PATENT DEFENDER: Apple answers more patent infringement cases than any other American company.
PATENT DEFENDER: Apple answers more patent infringement cases than any other American company.

A federal jury in Texas said Apple did not infringe five wireless technology patents owned by Canadian patent licensing firm Conversant Intellectual Property Management.

Core Wireless Licensing Sarl, a subsidiary of Ottawa-based Conversant, sued Apple in 2012 in a federal court in Tyler, Texas, alleging the iPhone maker used its patents on wireless data transmission in its iPhones and iPads without permission.

The jury deliberated for about five hours before delivering its verdict on Monday night, US time. The company, whose patents were originally held by Nokia was seeking US$100 million (NZ$135m) in damages at trial. It said it was entitled to a portion of Apple's device sales, and of similar, future devices. Apple pegged damages, if any, at less than $1 million.

READ MORE:

Secret lab tests for Apple Watch apps 

Apple Watch details revealed 

AirNZ all alone on Apple Watch

The jury also rejected Apple's claim that Core Wireless breached its obligation to license its patents, which are considered essential in the industry, on fair and non-discriminatory terms.

Conversant acquired Core Wireless and its 2,000 Nokia patents and patent applications in 2011. At the time, as part of an agreement with Nokia, Microsoft had a licence to those patents, according to Conversant company documents.

In its purchase of Core Wireless, Conversant agreed to return two-thirds of any revenue from licencing and litigating the patents back to Microsoft and Nokia, according to the documents. A Microsoft representative on could not confirm whether that agreement was still in force.

When it originally filed the lawsuit, Core Wireless alleged Apple infringed more than a dozen of its patents. But twice last year it removed several patents from the litigation in order to streamline the case, leaving just five at the core of the trial.

Apple is the most targeted company for lawsuits filed by companies that make money through licencing and enforcing their patents rather than making products.

Last month, a jury in the same courthouse in Tyler ordered Apple to pay US$532.9 million - one of the largest patent verdicts ever - after it found that the company's iTunes software infringed three patents owned by patent licensing firm Smartflash.

Representatives from Apple and Conversant did not immediately return requests for comment.

CASE: Core Wireless Licensing Sarl v. Apple Inc, in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, No. 12-cv-100.